A More Effective Argument
In my last post, I expressed that I find the topic of oil pipeline expansion, along with other complex issues, perplexing. Kinder Morgan wants me to focus on The People Behind the Pipeline—television commercials designed to offer a social connection to the project:
- Employees are happy in their communities and are proud of their company’s safety record.
- Landowners are pleased that Kinder Morgan has negotiated fairly.
Interested viewers are invited to visit blog.transmountain.com.
Activists opposed to pipeline expansion have also offered a social connection. The news media reported arrests of protesters, while they tried to block Kinder Morgan’s tests on Burnaby Mountain:
- David Suzuki’s granddaughter.
- An 84-year-old retired librarian.
- A mom with her 11-year-old daughter (the daughter was not arrested).
If I am an undecided observer, I have probably emotionally attached to both sides of the issue. But whose testimonial should carry more weight?
Mistakes Were Made recommends viewing testimonials with skepticism because of a cognitive bias called self justification.
- You look for evidence that confirms your opinion.
- I seek for you to confirm that I made a good decision.
If I cannot trust the testimonials from Kinder Morgan or the protesters, then I must return to struggling with the flood of facts. Do I have another choice?
Response to a Reader
Ted’s Facebook comment to an earlier post may suggest a solution.
Not related to your post specifically, but one year I decided I wouldn’t vote for the party that used negative or smear advertising. I figured if that was the best they could do, they didn’t deserve my vote. That year I didn’t vote.
But then, I read our councilmembers’ election brochures like I read resumes. “Yes, you sat on that committee. In real world hard values, of budgets, revenues, expenses, time frames, how did that committee do? What did it accomplish? What was your contribution to that? What was your significant contribution to that committee? Tell me about a time when your contribution to the work of that committee was the thing that was responsible for the success of one of the committee’s projects. Provide specific measurable examples.”
We live in a representative democracy. What would happen if we elected parties and representatives that actually deserved our vote? Could we entrust our elected officials to represent us, trusting that they would protect our interests? Do you want to try?